From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman v. Rubin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 22, 1966
183 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 65-514.

February 22, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, J. Gwynn Parker, J.

Leonard Sussman, Miami, for appellant.

I. Stanley Levine, Roger G. Welcher, Miami, Eli Breger, No. Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before TILLMAN PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.


The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the trial court and suffered an adverse jury verdict in an action for a fall in appellee's hotel, presents two points. Each point alleges a procedural error.

We do not determine whether the points present error because it is conclusively apparent from the record that no prejudicial error has been shown. The cause was fully tried, and the appellant was able to present to the jury each contention that she puts forward in the case. Therefore, this judgment is affirmed pursuant to the rule that an appellate court will not reverse a judgment based on substantial evidence where the record does not reveal that the errors resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Symmes v. Prairie Pebble Phosphate Co., 69 Fla. 4, 67 So. 228 (1915); Victor Hotel Owners v. Sperling, Fla.App. 1958, 104 So.2d 120.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kaufman v. Rubin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 22, 1966
183 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Kaufman v. Rubin

Case Details

Full title:ROSA KAUFMAN, APPELLANT, v. ADELE RUBIN ET AL., D/B/A VERSAILLES HOTEL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 22, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Presley v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Affirmed. See Kaufman v. Rubin, 183 So.2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ.,…

Jalayer v. Perlman

Moreover, the damages awarded by the jury were not legally inadequate and the finding of seventy percent…