From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. Knoesel Service Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1986
117 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Meehan, J.).


Order modified, as a matter of discretion, by adding thereto a provision directing the plaintiffs' attorneys to personally pay the defendants $500. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs' attorneys' time to pay $500 is extended to 15 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Inasmuch as this is not a case of neglect or abandonment but, rather, a situation wherein the plaintiffs' good-faith efforts to pursue settlement negotiations with the defendants' insurance carrier constituted a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving the complaint, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendants' application (see, Temkin v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriters Assn., 92 A.D.2d 758). Where, as here, the action appears to have some merit, the delay in the service of the complaint was neither inordinately protracted nor willful and the defendants have not been prejudiced thereby, the plaintiffs should not be deprived of their day in court (see, Gordon v Shore Park Pharmacy, 70 A.D.2d 651). However, in view of the dilatoriness of plaintiffs' attorneys and their failure to move pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) for an extension of time in which to serve the complaint, we have fixed an appropriate sanction. Lazer, J.P., Thompson, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Katz v. Knoesel Service Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 1986
117 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Katz v. Knoesel Service Center, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ASCHER KATZ et al., Respondents, v. KNOESEL SERVICE CENTER, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Joseph T. Ryerson Son, Inc. v. Petito

; in the event that condition is not complied with, the order is affirmed, with costs; in the event the…

First Nationwide Bank v. Pretel

The record contains absolutely no evidence to dispute the plaintiff's claim that the defendant, Amarante…