From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1969
33 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 2, 1969


Order, entered on June 11, 1969, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of striking therefrom the provision directing a reference on the question of the outgoing attorneys' fee and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The facts presented, especially the absence of any claim of an attorney's lien, indicate that the outgoing attorneys' proper remedy is a plenary action and not the disposition of their claim by means of a reference in a special proceeding.

Concur — Capozzoli, J.P., Tilzer, McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Katz v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1969
33 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Katz v. Katz

Case Details

Full title:CAROLE KATZ, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD KATZ, Defendant. JAY JULIEN, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rosenblum

The matter must be remitted to Special Term for a determination of the value of the petitioner's services in…