From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katterschinsky v. Bd. of Educ. of City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1925
215 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

October, 1925.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply to the board of education in the discharge of its governmental functions. ( Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N.Y. 196; Johnson v. Board of Education, 210 App. Div. 723.) The charge here is not that the board of education, as such, was negligent, but that the negligent act was that of the teachers in charge of the athletic exercises that were being conducted in the court yard of the school. We do not, however, intimate that there was negligence on the part of the teachers in charge.


Summaries of

Katterschinsky v. Bd. of Educ. of City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1925
215 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Katterschinsky v. Bd. of Educ. of City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRED KATTERSCHINSKY, JR., an Infant, by CHARLES ENDRES, His Guardian ad…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1925

Citations

215 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Lessin v. Board of Education

Some duties imposed upon the Board of Education may be carried out by the Board without the intervention of…

Graff v. Board of Education of City of New York

While the defendant is charged with the duty of providing for adequate supervision of activities within the…