From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kathy C. v. Alonzo E.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 11, 2018
157 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

5436

01-11-2018

In re KATHY C., Petitioner–Respondent, v. ALONZO E., Respondent–Appellant.

Geoffrey P. Berman, Larchmont, for appellant. Larry S. Bachner, New York, for respondent. Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.


Geoffrey P. Berman, Larchmont, for appellant.

Larry S. Bachner, New York, for respondent.

Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.

Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet–Daniels, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2016, which denied respondent father's motion to vacate his default in a proceeding which, after a hearing, granted petitioner maternal grandmother's application for modification of a prior custody and visitation order, granted her sole legal and physical custody of the subject child, and permitted her to relocate to South Carolina with the child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination that the father failed to substantiate his claims of a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense are supported by the record. The father's incarceration did not constitute excusable default (see Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v. Kastriot D., 101 A.D.3d 574, 956 N.Y.S.2d 52 [1st Dept. 2012], lv denied 21 N.Y.3d 853, 2013 WL 1800048 [2013] ). Further, he failed to seek vacatur until approximately six months after his release from incarceration (see Matter of Christopher James A. [Anne Elizabeth Pierre L.], 90 A.D.3d 515, 935 N.Y.S.2d 16 [1st Dept. 2011], lv denied 18 N.Y.3d 918, 941 N.Y.S.2d 551, 964 N.E.2d 1019 [2012] ).

The father also failed to present evidence of a meritorious defense to the petition, and the maternal grandmother demonstrated a change in circumstances since the prior custody order was entered and that her proposed modification would be in the child's best interest (see Matter of Johnny Eugene P. v. Michelle K.P., 140 A.D.3d 624, 33 N.Y.S.3d 704 [1st Dept. 2016] ; Matter of Manuel John M. v. Lisa Rossi M., 125 A.D.3d 407, 408, 3 N.Y.S.3d 14 [1st Dept. 2015], lv denied 25 N.Y.3d 904, 2015 WL 2032079 [2015] ).

Contrary to the father's argument, even assuming at a rehearing he would proffer evidence regarding a strong bond between him and the child, the fact that he had relinquished parenting responsibilities for the entirety of the child's life, coupled with his history of significant domestic violence, would nonetheless have merited a finding of extraordinary circumstances (see Matter of Sharon B. v. Tiffany P., 143 A.D.3d 573, 39 N.Y.S.3d 440 [1st Dept. 2016] ). Following the finding of extraordinary circumstances, the court properly found that it was in the child's best interest to award sole custody to the maternal grandmother and grant her permission to relocate with the child to South Carolina (see Matter of Christopher E.C. v. Ivana K.S., 143 A.D.3d 420, 38 N.Y.S.3d 181 [1st Dept. 2016] ).


Summaries of

Kathy C. v. Alonzo E.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 11, 2018
157 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Kathy C. v. Alonzo E.

Case Details

Full title:In re KATHY C., Petitioner–Respondent, v. ALONZO E., Respondent–Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 11, 2018

Citations

157 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
157 A.D.3d 503
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 234

Citing Cases

Wimbledon Fin. Master Fund, Ltd. v. Sage Grp. Consulting Inc.

Respondents failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default in answering the petition ( Lockard v.…

Lashawn K. v. Admin. for Children's Servs.

This is an error of law, as extraordinary circumstances is one of several bases for standing to seek custody…