From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kates v. Bledsoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 14, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0391 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0391

08-14-2013

DAVID E. KATES, Plaintiff, v. B.A. BLEDSOE, Defendant.


(Judge Brann)


(Magistrate Judge Schwab)


ORDER

BACKGROUND:

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the detailed July 25, 2013 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab. ECF No. 199. Plaintiff filed responses to the report and recommendation. ECF Nos. 200 and 201.

Because this Court agrees with Judge Schwab's thorough analysis, and all objections were addressed both by the report and recommendation and a prior Order of the undersigned, ECF No. 194, the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. United States Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. July 25, 2013, ECF No. 199.
2. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. January 15, 2013, ECF No. 171.
3. Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED as Moot. July 16, 2013, ECF No. 197.
4. Final judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff.
5. The action is dismissed with prejudice.
6. The clerk is directed to close the case file.

BY THE COURT:

____________

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kates v. Bledsoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 14, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0391 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Kates v. Bledsoe

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. KATES, Plaintiff, v. B.A. BLEDSOE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 14, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-0391 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2013)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. City of Philadelphia

The municipality must have been subjectively aware of the infestation to be deliberately indifferent to it.…

Thompson v. City of Philadelphia

“A prolonged pest infestation . . . may be considered a deprivation sufficient to constitute a constitutional…