From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaskel v. Impellitteri

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 17, 1953
306 N.Y. 609 (N.Y. 1953)

Opinion

Submitted November 16, 1953

Decided November 17, 1953


Motion for a stay denied. All concur except FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., who dissent only as to the denial of the stay and vote to grant a stay to and including November 30, 1953, to enable the appellant to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States or to a Justice thereof for a stay in connection with an application for a writ of certiorari. Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, as follows: Whether the taking by the City of New York, of the properties here involved, was, on this record, a deprivation of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such deprivation.


Summaries of

Kaskel v. Impellitteri

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 17, 1953
306 N.Y. 609 (N.Y. 1953)
Case details for

Kaskel v. Impellitteri

Case Details

Full title:C. CLARENCE KASKEL, Appellant, v. VINCENT R. IMPELLITTERI et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 17, 1953

Citations

306 N.Y. 609 (N.Y. 1953)
115 N.E.2d 832

Citing Cases

Sorbino v. New Brunswick

There is sound authority for the proposition that the existence of isolated or a few sound structures…

Sevenson Hotel Associates, Inc. v. Stranges

The court properly determined that the amended petition fails to state a cause of action under General…