From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karth v. Orth

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1858
10 Cal. 192 (Cal. 1858)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, County of Sacramento.

         This was an action of ejectment, to recover possession of a tract of land.

         The case was tried in the Court below, before a jury, who returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and judgment was regularly entered thereon. The defendant moved the Court for a new trial, which was denied. The record embodies no statement on appeal, showing the alleged errors of the Court below. Nor does it appear from the record the grounds upon which the motion for a new trial was denied.

         COUNSEL:

         J. H. McKune, for Appellant.

          Clark & Gass, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Field, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          BURNETT, Judge

         There being in the record no statement on appeal, we are confined to the judgment-roll, which being regular, the judgment must be affirmed


Summaries of

Karth v. Orth

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1858
10 Cal. 192 (Cal. 1858)
Case details for

Karth v. Orth

Case Details

Full title:KARTH v. ORTH

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1858

Citations

10 Cal. 192 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

Reinhart v. Company D

(Gen. Stats. 3358-3362; Howard v. Richards, 2 Nev. 128; Klein v. Allenbach, 6 Nev. 159; Hayne on New Trial,…

Paige v. Roeding

         The documents filed by counsel are no part of the record on appeal, and cannot be considered.…