From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 22, 1996
143 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1996)

Opinion

Argued November 27, 1995 —

Decided January 22, 1996.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Francis J. Zazzaro argued the cause for appellants Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc., Hartz Mountain Development Corp., Hartz Claiborne Limited Partnership, Joseph Romeo, Kenneth Carl Bonte and Keith A. Michels ( Waters, McPherson, McNeill, attorneys; Jason K. Gross, on the briefs).

Elliott Abrutyn argued the cause for appellant Howell Steel, Inc. ( Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn Lisowski, attorneys; David L. Wikstrom and Richard E. Snyder, on the briefs). Bradley M. Wilson argued the cause for appellant Nacamuli Associates ( Sachs, Maitlin, Fleming, Greene Wilson, attorneys; John J. Cignavitch, on the brief).

Sean F. Colquhoun argued the cause for appellant Eastern Steel Erectors, Inc. ( Colquhoun Colquhoun, attorneys).

Thomas A. Kalapos argued the cause for respondent ( Atkinson, DeBartolo Kalapos, attorneys).

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Shebell of the Appellate Division, reported at 278 N.J. Super. 129, 650 A.2d 808 (1994).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — none.


Summaries of

Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 22, 1996
143 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1996)
Case details for

Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN KANE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC., HARTZ…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 22, 1996

Citations

143 N.J. 141 (N.J. 1996)
669 A.2d 816

Citing Cases

Fernandes v. Dar Dev. Corp.

In an unpublished opinion, the Appellate Division determined that the trial court properly denied a…

Estate of D'Avila v. Hugo Neu Schnitzer East

He did not indicate exactly how the jury should be instructed, or how the special interrogatories on the…