From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kanaan v. Osborne

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 28, 2007
950 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2D06-5584.

March 28, 2007.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.

Ronald J. Lamb and Lisa L. Cullaro of Morgan, Lamb, Goldman Valles, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.

David G. Eaton, Tampa, for Respondent.


Elias Kanaan, M.D., filed this petition for writ of certiorari seeking to quash a circuit court order which compelled him to provide notes that he claims are exempt from discovery pursuant to section 766.205(4), Florida Statutes (2005). The respondent, Jimmy D. Osborne, correctly concedes that the notes are exempt from discovery pursuant to this court's holding in Grimshaw v. Schwegel, 572 So.2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Section 766.205(4) provides, "No statement, discussion, written document, report, or other work product generated solely by the presuit investigation process is discoverable or admissible in any civil action for any purpose by the opposing party."

Accordingly, we grant Kanaan's petition for writ of certiorari, quash the circuit court's order, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Kanaan v. Osborne

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 28, 2007
950 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Kanaan v. Osborne

Case Details

Full title:Elias KANAAN, M.D., Petitioner, v. Jimmy D. OSBORNE, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 28, 2007

Citations

950 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)