From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamp v. In Sportswear Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1972
39 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

June 13, 1972


Order of Appellate Term, First Department, entered on January 31, 1972, affirming an order of the Civil Court, entered on June 21, 1971, granting defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint and denying plaintiff's motion to preclude the defendant for failure to serve a bill of particulars with reference to affirmative defenses and to strike defendant's answers for failure to appear at examinations before trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Lupiano at the Appellate Term. The order of the Civil Court is likewise reversed, on the law, the cross motion denied and the motions in chief remitted to the Civil Court for determination. Appellant shall recover of respondent $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal.

Concur — McGivern, J.P. Kupferman, Murphy, McNally and Eager, JJ. [ 70 Misc.2d 898.]


Summaries of

Kamp v. In Sportswear Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1972
39 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Kamp v. In Sportswear Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN A. KAMP, as Assignee of AAA STRETCH, INC., Appellant, v. IN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Traktman v. City of New York

Further, the assignment does not violate CPLR 321 (a), which prohibits a corporation from appearing pro se.…

Rembrandt Agency v. Van-Go

There is no basis in law for a corporate defendant to assign away its status as defendant to an individual or…