From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalomiris v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 2, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term acted properly in restoring the instant action to the Trial Calendar in view of the defendant's failure to establish that the alleged oral settlement between the parties complied with the requirements of CPLR 2104. Under that provision, an oral settlement between the parties or their counsel will be enforceable if made in open court. Moreover, the agreement reached in open court must have definite terms, and, at the very least, must be entered in the minute book of such a proceeding (see, Matter of Dolgin Eldert Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 1; Graffeo v. Brenes, 85 A.D.2d 656). Herein, the mere entry on the clerk's docket card indicating that the case was settled, in and of itself, is insufficient to satisfy CPLR 2104. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kalomiris v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Kalomiris v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:ANASTASIOS KALOMIRIS, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 367 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Diarassouba v. Urban

The Court of Appeals has defined open court as "a judicial proceeding in a court, whether held in public or…

Willgerodt on Behalf of Maj. Peoples' v. Hohri

An agreement entered into by a pro se plaintiff in open court is likewise binding. Jacobs v. Jacobs, ___…