From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalman v. Board of Aldermen of Chelsea

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Jan 6, 1982
429 N.E.2d 726 (Mass. App. Ct. 1982)

Opinion

January 6, 1982.


It is obvious from the face of the plaintiffs' complaint that the action was brought in the wrong county. See G.L.c. 139, § 2. Therefore, the allowance by the judge of the defendants' motion to dismiss based, in part, on Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3), 365 Mass. 755 (1975), was not error. Nothing in Attorney Gen. v. Industrial Natl. Bank, 380 Mass. 533 (1980), requires a judge to dispose of a motion to transfer prior to ruling on a motion to dismiss. Because the judgment does not precisely indicate the ground upon which the complaint was dismissed, the judgment is vacated and another judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3) for lack of venue shall be entered. Id. at 538.

So ordered. Jordan L. Shapiro for the plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Kalman v. Board of Aldermen of Chelsea

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Jan 6, 1982
429 N.E.2d 726 (Mass. App. Ct. 1982)
Case details for

Kalman v. Board of Aldermen of Chelsea

Case Details

Full title:NEIL KALMAN another vs. BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF CHELSEA others

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Jan 6, 1982

Citations

429 N.E.2d 726 (Mass. App. Ct. 1982)
429 N.E.2d 726

Citing Cases

Smith v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 12(h); Sebastian v. Carroll, 353 Mass. 465, 468 (1968); Maker v. Bouthier,…