From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 31, 1985
486 A.2d 334 (N.J. 1985)

Summary

adopting the position of the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws, supra, § 187

Summary of this case from Hopkins v. Duckett

Opinion

Argued January 7, 1985 —

Decided January 31, 1985.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant ( Apruzzese McDermott, Mastro Murphy, attorneys).

Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. ( Conway Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys).

Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt ( Amdur Friedrich, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 16 (1984).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 31, 1985
486 A.2d 334 (N.J. 1985)

adopting the position of the Restatement (Second) of Conflicts of Laws, supra, § 187

Summary of this case from Hopkins v. Duckett
Case details for

Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 31, 1985

Citations

486 A.2d 334 (N.J. 1985)
486 A.2d 334

Citing Cases

Yale Materials v. White Storage

AT T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 649, 106 S.Ct. 1415, 1421, 89…

TJR Constr. Co. v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am.

In deciding a choice-of-law issue, we apply New Jersey law, which ordinarily honors "a commercial agreement…