From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalinoglu v. Kritikos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 2000
273 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted May 3, 2000.

July 26, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated July 23, 1999, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Lewis, Johs, Avallone, Aviles Kaufman, Melville, N.Y. (Dawn C. DeSimone of counsel), for appellant.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The Supreme Court erred when it denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment. The defendant established as a matter of law that the injured plaintiff's actions were a superseding cause of her accident (see, Gilmore v. Ritchie, 260 A.D.2d 347; Esposito v. Rea, 243 A.D.2d 536; Smith v. West Rochelle Travel Agency, 238 A.D.2d 398; Wright v. New York City Tr. Auth., 221 A.D.2d 431), and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to this issue.


Summaries of

Kalinoglu v. Kritikos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 2000
273 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Kalinoglu v. Kritikos

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET KALINOGLU, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JOHN KRITIKOS, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 26, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 749