Summary
finding "Plaintiff's complaint does not set forth a coherent set of factual allegations that could support a cause of action" and the court lacked jurisdiction over the complaint
Summary of this case from Kalincheva v. NeubarthOpinion
Case No. 14-CV-0020 (PJS/JJG)
02-03-2014
MAGDALINA KALINCHEVA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. JESSE NEUBARTH, Defendant.
Magdalina Kalincheva, pro se.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Magdalina Kalincheva, pro se.
This matter is before the Court on the objection of plaintiff Magdalina Kalincheva to the January 15, 2014 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham. In that R&R, Judge Graham recommends dismissing Kalincheva's complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review, the Court overrules the objection and adopts the R&R.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court OVERRULES plaintiff's objection [ECF No. 18] and ADOPTS the January 15, 2014 R&R [ECF No. 17]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs [ECF No. 3] is DENIED.
3. Plaintiff's pending motions [ECF Nos. 7-12] are DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
__________
Patrick J. Schiltz
United States District Judge