From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalbaugh v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 24, 2019
No. CIV-18-951-C (W.D. Okla. Sep. 24, 2019)

Opinion

No. CIV-18-951-C

09-24-2019

WAYNE DUKE KALBAUGH, Petitioner, v. JIMMY MARTIN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Mitchell entered a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on July 23, 2019, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and law are accurately set out in Judge Mitchell's Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his Objection, Petitioner generally restates his previous arguments, misapplies the legal precedent he argues, and simply disagrees, without legal or factual foundation, with the conclusions contained in the R&R. To the contrary, the R&R accurately states the facts and the law, and even after consideration of Petitioner's objections, is the only conclusion permitted here.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2019.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kalbaugh v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 24, 2019
No. CIV-18-951-C (W.D. Okla. Sep. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Kalbaugh v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE DUKE KALBAUGH, Petitioner, v. JIMMY MARTIN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Sep 24, 2019

Citations

No. CIV-18-951-C (W.D. Okla. Sep. 24, 2019)