From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kakowski v. Pingel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2016
NO. CV 15-7690-SVW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)

Opinion

NO. CV 15-7690-SVW (KS)

03-29-2016

BRIAN KAKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN PINGEL, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the February 2, 2016 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the equal protection claim against Defendant Pingel is DISMISSED with prejudice; and (2) the claims against Defendant Lynn are DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED: March 29, 2016

/s/_________

STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kakowski v. Pingel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2016
NO. CV 15-7690-SVW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Kakowski v. Pingel

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KAKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN PINGEL, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2016

Citations

NO. CV 15-7690-SVW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Kakowski v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Plaintiff asserts that defendant Greene "repeatedly read plaintiff's legal mail which was marked (Official…