From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jurist v. Hertz Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 7, 1965
48 Misc. 2d 278 (N.Y. App. Term 1965)

Opinion

October 7, 1965

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, MAURICE WAHL, J.

Cymrot Wolin ( Benjamin Heller of counsel), for appellants.

Michael A. Schwartz and Daniel M. Hirsch for respondent.


Plaintiff's failure to comply with rule 15 of the Civil Court of the City of New York Rules precluded him from offering the testimony of the doctor who examined him the day before the trial and who was not the original treating doctor. Failure to furnish defendants with this doctor's report or afford a physical examination with respect to the alleged damage to plaintiff's left eye was reversible error. The testimony having been admitted, the failure to strike same from the record was reversible error. Moreover, no proper foundation was established for his opinion that the present alleged condition of plaintiff's left eye could have been caused by the accident.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., TILZER and HECHT, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Jurist v. Hertz Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 7, 1965
48 Misc. 2d 278 (N.Y. App. Term 1965)
Case details for

Jurist v. Hertz Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY JURIST, Respondent, v. HERTZ CORPORATION et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1965

Citations

48 Misc. 2d 278 (N.Y. App. Term 1965)
264 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Strobel v. Dave Oil Burner Co.

There was and remains a dispute between the parties as to whether the plaintiff has furnished copies of its…