stating that removal of tree infested with termites and carpenter ants involves elements of danger, even though plaintiff complained of being unaware of extent of rot in tree; plaintiff claimed that had he known how rotten tree was, he would have taken additional precautions
Summary of this case from Frost v. Dayton Power and Light Company1993.
stating that removal of tree infested with termites and carpenter ants involves elements of danger, even though plaintiff complained of being unaware of extent of rot in tree; plaintiff claimed that had he known how rotten tree was, he would have taken additional precautions
Summary of this case from Frost v. Dayton Power and Light CompanyFull title:JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Plaintiffs verbally agreed to a settlement figure with Defendant Children's Hospital. However, this was done…
State v. MakuchWe find the testimony as to the hash mark spacing and placement was sufficient and the trial court's findings…