From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Junior v. Warden

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 26, 1975
91 Nev. 111 (Nev. 1975)

Summary

applying procedural default rule and requiring defendants to exhaust direct appeals if they want to proceed with habeas relief

Summary of this case from Bargas v. Burns

Opinion

No. 7578

February 26, 1975

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Carson City; Frank B. Gregory, Judge.

Horace R. Goff, State Public Defender, and Michael R. Griffin, Deputy Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, and Robert A. Groves, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondent.


OPINION


We hold that this court's decision in Johnson v. Warden, 89 Nev. 476, 515 P.2d 63 (1973), applies to post-conviction applications for habeas corpus under NRS Chapter 34, as well as to petitions for post-conviction relief under NRS Chapter 177.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal of appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus, which alleged no reasons for omitting to raise, on direct appeal, appellant's current attack on proceedings certifying him for adult trial. See: Junior v. State, 89 Nev. 121, 507 P.2d 1037 (1973).


Summaries of

Junior v. Warden

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 26, 1975
91 Nev. 111 (Nev. 1975)

applying procedural default rule and requiring defendants to exhaust direct appeals if they want to proceed with habeas relief

Summary of this case from Bargas v. Burns
Case details for

Junior v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE JUNIOR, APPELLANT, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Feb 26, 1975

Citations

91 Nev. 111 (Nev. 1975)
532 P.2d 1037

Citing Cases

Bargas v. Burns

The case law reflects a jurisprudential concern that piecemeal litigation serves only to congest the state…

Warden v. Lyons

The district court determined that respondent had shown "good cause" why his petition should be entertained…