From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Julian v. Security Mutual Insurance Co. [4th Dept 2001

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 21, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Counsel Fees.

BEFORE: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, WISNER, KEHOE AND BURNS, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly awarded attorney's fees to plaintiff upon determining following a bench trial that plaintiff is entitled to recover for property damage covered under an insurance policy issued by defendant. The legal untenability of defendant's position should have been apparent to defendant from the outset of the action, and thus the defense to plaintiff's action was "completely without merit in law", insupportable "by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law", and "undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation" ( 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; see, First Deposit Natl. Bank v. Van Allen, 277 A.D.2d ___ [decided Nov. 28, 2000]; Basil B. v. Mexico Cent. School Dist., 248 A.D.2d 985, lv. dismissed in part and denied in part 92 N.Y.2d 834, lv dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 857).


Summaries of

Julian v. Security Mutual Insurance Co. [4th Dept 2001

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Julian v. Security Mutual Insurance Co. [4th Dept 2001

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. JULIAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SECURITY MUTUAL INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

Premier Capital v. Damon Realty Corp.

Defendants' actions have been "completely without merit in law," they have been undertaken "primarily to…

In re Farley

Christopher's motion to quash was Motion # 5. As set forth below, Jonathan's unsupported arguments "wavered…