From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyeeta v. Trump Mgt., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 2004
8 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-07078.

Decided June 7, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated May 22, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Kiley, Kiley Kiley, Great Neck, N.Y. (James D. Kiley of counsel), for appellant.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a water-like substance on the exterior step of a building owned by the defendant. The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition which caused the plaintiff to fall ( see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Gonforone v. Southland Corp., 300 A.D.2d 443; Dixon v. Lichtman, 295 A.D.2d 308; Bradish v. Tank Tech Corp., 216 A.D.2d 505; Pirillo v. Longwood Assocs., 179 A.D.2d 744). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).

S. MILLER, J.P., ADAMS, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Joyeeta v. Trump Mgt., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 2004
8 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Joyeeta v. Trump Mgt., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MALLIK, JOYEETA, respondent, v. TRUMP MANAGEMENT, INC., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 732

Citing Cases

Regina v. Village of Dobbs

ion, a defective condition is not established merely because the door closed with sufficient force to sever…

Donnelly v. St. Agnes Cathedral Sch.

, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether, at the time of the accident, the door…