From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joy MM Del. Inc. v. Cincinnati Mine Mach. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-1415 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1415

01-04-2012

JOY MM DELAWARE, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. CINCINNATI MINE MACHINERY, CO., Defendant.


ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 4 day of January, 2012, upon consideration of the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Final Judgment [document #86], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and in accordance with the Court's Memorandum and Order of December 5, 2011, FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in that:

(1) Cincinnati Mine Machinery's DA-350 product does not infringe Claim 2 of U.S. Patent No. 6,662,932 ("the '932 patent");
(2) Claim 2 of the '932 patent is invalid due to a violation of the best mode requirement;
(3) The '932 patent is not unenforceable due to inequitable conduct;
(4) Claim 2 of the '932 patent is not invalid as anticipated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining claims, counterclaims, and defenses are dismissed, without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark the instant CASE CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________, C.J.

Hon. Gary L. Lancaster,

Chief United States District Judge

cc: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Joy MM Del. Inc. v. Cincinnati Mine Mach. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-1415 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Joy MM Del. Inc. v. Cincinnati Mine Mach. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOY MM DELAWARE, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. CINCINNATI MINE MACHINERY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1415 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2012)