From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 4, 2006
924 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-2240.

November 30, 2005. Rehearing Denied April 4, 2006.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Mandamus.

Livingston Joseph, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Maria T. Armas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


Livingston Joseph has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and/or motion to enforce mandate. He contends that this court's mandate in Joseph v. State, 547 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), was never complied with.

The State's response demonstrates that on remand from this court's 1989 decision, the trial court in 1990 complied with the mandate by entering a sentencing guidelines departure order on count two, and vacating count three. Further, the petitioner has previously raised the claim that the trial court failed to comply with this court's mandate, and relief has been denied on previous occasions.

The petition for writ of mandamus and alternative motion to enforce mandate are denied.


Summaries of

Joseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 4, 2006
924 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Joseph v. State

Case Details

Full title:Livingston JOSEPH, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)