From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph H. Meyer Bros., Inc. v. Higgins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

February, 1931.


Orders denying motions to vacate notices of examination before trial modified so as to provide that at the time of each examination the protection of secrecy be imposed with respect to the evidence adduced, so that such evidence, in so far as it concerns the secret process particularly, may not become available to other than the parties to the litigation and the court or referee hearing the testimony upon the examinations and upon the trial. As so modified the orders are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. Examinations to proceed on five days' notice at the place and hour stated in the respective orders. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Joseph H. Meyer Bros., Inc. v. Higgins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Joseph H. Meyer Bros., Inc. v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH H. MEYER BROS., INC., Respondent, v. EDWARD F. HIGGINS and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Monte v. Smith

Judicial policy favors permitting parties upon a proper showing to obtain information necessary and relevant…

GRIFFIN MFG. CO., INC., v. GOLD DUST CORP (No. 2.)

It is obvious that such an examination will compel the corporate defendants to disclose their own secret…