From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jorgensen v. Debco Construction

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Jan 10, 2003
115 Wn. App. 1002 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

looking to date when sewer system was functional to begin calculating statute of repose as "dewatering activity" was only "component part" of entire sewer installation project

Summary of this case from BAGG v. THOMPSON

Opinion

No. 28089-2-II.

January 10, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 01-2-06522-5, Kitty-Ann van Doorninck, J., entered November 2, 2001.


Reversed by unpublished opinion per Hunt, C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and QuinnBrintnall, JJ.


Summaries of

Jorgensen v. Debco Construction

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Jan 10, 2003
115 Wn. App. 1002 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

looking to date when sewer system was functional to begin calculating statute of repose as "dewatering activity" was only "component part" of entire sewer installation project

Summary of this case from BAGG v. THOMPSON
Case details for

Jorgensen v. Debco Construction

Case Details

Full title:GARY JORGENSEN, ET AL., Appellants , v. DEBCO CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C., ET…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two

Date published: Jan 10, 2003

Citations

115 Wn. App. 1002 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)
115 Wash. App. 1002

Citing Cases

BAGG v. THOMPSON

Thus, courts have found that the time period of the statute of repose begins when the whole project is…