Summary
In Weston v. Jordan, 168 Mass. 401, the question was as to the relation between customer and broker after the broker had parted with the shares after repeated demands by the customer and refusal by the broker to deliver the shares, and it was held that a valid cause of action arose in favor of the customer, whether for breach of contract, or for conversion, it matters not.
Summary of this case from Richardson v. ShawOpinion
Gen. No. 47,881. (Abstract of Decision.)
May 25, 1960.
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. GEORGE B. WEISS, Judge, presiding. Reversed.
Rogers, Rogers, Strayhorn, and Harth, of Chicago (Howard T. Savage, of counsel) for defendants-appellants;
Gomberg, Missner, and Lacob, of Chicago, for appellee.
Not to be published in full.