Opinion
Civil No. 06-cv-222-PB.
October 13, 2006
ORDER
Re: Document No. 22, Plaintiff Jordan's Motion Renewing His Request For Discovery
Ruling: DENIED. Discovery was stayed. At the pretrial counsel was queried as to whether discovery under Rule 56(f) was necessary and it appeared it was not needed. The present motion does not request discovery under Rule 56(f), plaintiff has filed his objection to the defendant's Rule 56 motion, and counsel provides no justification to lift the discovery stay.