From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Nov 4, 2015
127 A.3d 397 (Del. 2015)

Summary

finding that even if defendants' OCME-related claims were not procedurally barred under Rule 61, “in any event, under our precedent, the petitions lack merit as none of the defendants have pled any basis to avoid the effect of their voluntary and knowing plea of guilty and none has suffered an unjust conviction”

Summary of this case from Rowley v. State

Opinion

No. 67, 2015

11-04-2015

Dustin Jones, et al., Defendants Below–Appellants, v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Nov 4, 2015
127 A.3d 397 (Del. 2015)

finding that even if defendants' OCME-related claims were not procedurally barred under Rule 61, “in any event, under our precedent, the petitions lack merit as none of the defendants have pled any basis to avoid the effect of their voluntary and knowing plea of guilty and none has suffered an unjust conviction”

Summary of this case from Rowley v. State
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dustin Jones, et al., Defendants Below–Appellants, v. State of Delaware…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

127 A.3d 397 (Del. 2015)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.SeeAricidiacono v. State,…

Williams v. State

––– A.3d ––––, 2015 WL 5933984, at *3–4 (Del. Oct. 12, 2015).See also State v. Jones, 2015 WL 6746873, at *1…