From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 4, 1952
248 S.W.2d 928 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952)

Opinion

No. 25822.

April 16, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 4, 1952.

Appeal from the District Court, Smith County, Otis T. Dunagan, J.

Alex Pope, Tyler, James S. Grisham, Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.


Indecent fondling of the person of a female minor is the offense; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

That appellant fondled the privates of a four-year-old female is shown by the testimony of at least two disinterested witnesses. The facts warrant the jury's conclusion of guilt.

Appellant insists that the so-called fondling statute, Art. 535d, Vernon's Ann.P.C., is vague and indefinite both as to the offense denounced and the punishment authorized to be assessed thereunder.

We deem the validity of the statute to have been determined by the case of Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 238 S.W.2d 529.

The statute applies to 'any person.' It became unnecessary, therefore, for the state to prove either the sex or the age of the appellant. If appellant was not of sufficient age to authorize his conviction of a felony, he should have so shown.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 4, 1952
248 S.W.2d 928 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONES v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 4, 1952

Citations

248 S.W.2d 928 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952)
157 Tex. Crim. 382

Citing Cases

Bannister v. State

The court held that the plea of guilty could not be attacked in habeas corpus proceedings on the ground that…