From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 14, 2000
760 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

holding rule 3.800(c) does not authorize trial court to increase the sentence

Summary of this case from State v. Folkes

Opinion

No. 2D99-2512.

June 14, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Brandt C. Downey, III, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas Chanco, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Edward D. Jones appeals the trial court's order adding a term of probation to his sentence following a motion for rehearing. Because the trial court's order increased the original sentence, we conclude that the trial court erred and remand this case to the trial court to strike the probationary term.

At a sentencing hearing, Jones admitted to violating his probation in exchange for a sentence of five and a half years' imprisonment. Three days later, after the State filed a motion for rehearing, the trial court added one year of probation to Jones' sentence. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 (c) provides for modification of a legal sentence "to include any of the provisions of chapter 948, Florida Statutes," which deals with probation and community control. However, rule 3.800(c) does not authorize the trial court to "increase the original sentence." Committee Notes to 1980 Amendment of Rule 3.800. Therefore, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to add a probationary term three days after imposing the original sentence. See Dailey v. State, 575 So.2d 237, 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Sterling v. State, 682 So.2d 694, 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

We remand this case to the trial court with directions to strike the probationary term.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 14, 2000
760 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

holding rule 3.800(c) does not authorize trial court to increase the sentence

Summary of this case from State v. Folkes
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward D. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 14, 2000

Citations

760 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Folkes

See State v. Watson, 909 So.2d 942, 945 n. 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (holding certiorari not available to permit…

Pate v. State

The State may only challenge a sentence reduction by direct appeal. Gartrell v. State, 626 So.2d 1364, 1365,…