From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 12, 1985
465 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-1084.

March 12, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Gerald Kogan, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Diane Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


As it is not fundamental error to fail to instruct on an essential element of an offense where the existence of that element is not in genuine dispute, Morton v. State, 459 So.2d 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), the trial court's instruction on an undisputed issue, even if erroneous, does not require reversal where there is no suggestion that the jury was misled.

The remaining issue raised by defendant has been decided adversely to him in L.S. v. State, 464 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 1985), approving, 446 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 12, 1985
465 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JONES, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 12, 1985

Citations

465 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

McPhee v. State

However, it is not fundamental error to fail to instruct on an essential element of a crime where the…

Douglas v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.530; State v. Delva, 575 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1991); State v. DiGuilio, 491…