From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 30, 1976
336 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. BB-133.

August 30, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, William Frye, III, J.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


A jury found Jones guilty of breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit grand larceny, robbery, sexual battery and assault and battery. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a change of venue, in refusing a requested instruction, and in deferring adjudication of guilt and imposition of sentence from day to day and term to term on the crime of assault and battery.

The record reflects that Jones received a fair and impartial trial by a panel of impartial jurors. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Jones' motion for a change of venue. Dobbert v. State, 328 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1976).

Jones requested that the trial court charge the jury that "in order to establish identity by use of fingerprints, the prosecutor must show that the fingerprints of the accused could only have been made at the time the crime was committed." The court denied the request. Although the requested charge accurately states the law, the court did not err in denying it, because it properly gave the jury charge 2.14, circumstantial evidence, Florida Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases. We must point out, however, that the record furnished us would not have been sufficient for us to determine whether the court erred.

The trial court did err in deferring adjudication and sentencing on the crime of assault and battery from day to day and term to term. McArthur v. State, 330 So.2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Jones is entitled to have all offenses of which he was found guilty disposed of expeditiously.

The judgments and sentences on the first three crimes are affirmed. The deferral of adjudication and sentence on the crime of assault and battery is reversed and this case is remanded with directions to adjudicate and make appropriate disposition of this crime.

BOYER, C.J., and McCORD, J., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 30, 1976
336 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Jones v. State

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS JONES, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT), v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 30, 1976

Citations

336 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Wilcox v. State

345 So.2d at 1062. As to the defendant's contention that the court erred in failing to give a special…

Thomas v. State

Affirmed. See Thomas v. State, 494 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Thomas v. State, 494 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th…