From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Pleasant Valley State Prison

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2010
1:01-cv-05287-AWI-SMS-(PC), (Resolves Motion#147) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2010)

Opinion

1:01-cv-05287-AWI-SMS-(PC), (Resolves Motion#147).

March 9, 2010


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS


Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 8, 2010, defendants Loo, Huang, Ortiz and Mc Vicar ("defendants") filed a request for modification of the court's order of February 18, 2010. (Doc. 144.) Defendants request modification to reflect an extension of time until March 3, 2010 to respond to plaintiff's First Set of Admissions to each of the defendants.

Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Defendants are granted an extension of time nunc pro tunc to March 3, 2010, in which to respond to: (1) First Set of Admissions to Defendant Loo; (2) First Set of Admissions to Defendant McVicar; (3) First Set of Admissions to Defendant Ortiz; and (4) First Set of Admissions to Defendant Huang. Defendants' motion for modification is hereby resolved. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Pleasant Valley State Prison

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2010
1:01-cv-05287-AWI-SMS-(PC), (Resolves Motion#147) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Jones v. Pleasant Valley State Prison

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE JONES, Plaintiff, v. PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 9, 2010

Citations

1:01-cv-05287-AWI-SMS-(PC), (Resolves Motion#147) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2010)

Citing Cases

Fields v. Masiel

This is sufficient to have exhausted Plaintiff's administrative remedies. See, e.g., Coats v. Fox, 481…