From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Pittman

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Apr 5, 2007
Civil No. 3:06-0228 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:06-0228.

April 5, 2007


ORDER


On March 15, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation. (Docket No. 26) No timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Substitute United States as Defendant (Docket No. 3) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant (Docket No. 4) are GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Pittman

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Apr 5, 2007
Civil No. 3:06-0228 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Jones v. Pittman

Case Details

Full title:DANNY ROY JONES, Plaintiff, v. LORI PITTMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Apr 5, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 3:06-0228 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Goosby v. U.S.

Rather, at a minimum, the plaintiff must produce evidence that raises a genuine issue of material fact on the…

Goosby v. U.S.

Pritchett, 402 F. Supp. 2d at 812. Rather, at a minimum, the plaintiff must produce evidence that raises a…