From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. OSCI

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 24, 1991
108 Or. App. 230 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

explaining procedural chronology of amendment and reason for withdrawal of original decision

Summary of this case from Saif Corp. v. Bales (In re Comp. of Bales)

Opinion

88-10417; CA A64627

Filed June 19, 1991

Reversed and remanded July 24, 1991

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Merrill Schneider, Portland, for petition.

No appearance contra.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

BUTTLER, P.J.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion withdrawn; reversed and remanded to Workers' Compensation Board for award of attorney fees.


Claimant has filed a petition for review, which we treat as a motion for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, of our May 15, 1991, decision. 107 Or. App. 78, 810 P.2d 1318 (1991). We allow the motion, withdraw our former opinion and reverse and remand the case to the Board. In that opinion, we held that ORS 656.386(1) provides no basis for an award of insurer-paid attorney fees to a claimant when the employer withdraws its denial of the claim after the claimant's request for hearing has been filed but before the referee has decided the matter. On June 19, 1991, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill 540, which amends ORS 656.386(1) so that it now expressly provides for attorney fees under those circumstances.

The statute now provides that if "an attorney is instrumental in obtaining compensation for a claimant and a hearing by the referee is not held, a reasonable attorney fee shall be allowed." The amendment, which became effective on its passage, "applies to all claims for which an order relating to the issue on which attorney fees are sought has not become final on or before the effective date of this 1991 Act, regardless of the date of injury." SB 540, § 3.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion withdrawn; reversed and remanded to the Workers' Compensation Board for award of attorney fees.


Summaries of

Jones v. OSCI

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 24, 1991
108 Or. App. 230 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

explaining procedural chronology of amendment and reason for withdrawal of original decision

Summary of this case from Saif Corp. v. Bales (In re Comp. of Bales)

explaining procedural chronology of amendment and reason for withdrawal of original decision

Summary of this case from Saif Corp. v. Bales (In re Comp. of Bales)

In Jones v. OSCI, 108 Or. App. 230, 814 P.2d 558 (1991), we concluded that Senate Bill 540, amending ORS 656.386(1), expressly provides for attorney fees under the circumstances in this case.

Summary of this case from Department of Just. Inmate Ins. Fund v. Hendershott
Case details for

Jones v. OSCI

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Duane L. Jones, Claimant. Duane L…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 24, 1991

Citations

108 Or. App. 230 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
814 P.2d 558

Citing Cases

Saif v. Allen

The legislature added the third sentence to ORS 656.386 (1) in 1991 to permit recovery of a fee where the…

Saif v. Allen

We disagree. The legislature added the emphasized language to the statute in 1991, in response to our…