From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Law Firm of Hill and Ponton

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Aug 13, 2002
No. 6:00-cv-746-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Aug. 13, 2002)

Opinion

No. 6:00-cv-746-Orl-31JGG

August 13, 2002


ORDER


On July 24, 2002, Magistrate Judge Glazebrook entered his Report and Recommendation (Doc. 85), recommending that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 69) be granted. On August 12, 2002, Plaintiff filed a perfunctory objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 87). The Court has reviewed this matter de novo, and has concluded that the Report and Recommendation is correct in all respects. It is, therefore

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Glazebrook is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order;

2. Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 69) is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. 62) is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. All other pending motions are DENTED, as moot.


Summaries of

Jones v. Law Firm of Hill and Ponton

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Aug 13, 2002
No. 6:00-cv-746-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Aug. 13, 2002)
Case details for

Jones v. Law Firm of Hill and Ponton

Case Details

Full title:MARK JACOB JONES, Plaintiff, v. LAW FIRM OF HILL AND PONTON, JOY SHELLEY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Aug 13, 2002

Citations

No. 6:00-cv-746-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Aug. 13, 2002)