From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Clark

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2015
2:14-cv-0987 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)

Opinion


GERALD JONES, Plaintiff, v. C. CLARK, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-0987 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 3, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant's August 12, 2015 motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48.) However, due to outstanding discovery issues, the court has vacated the dispositive motion deadline. (ECF No. 47.) Similarly, plaintiff need not respond to defendant's summary judgment motion until the discovery process is complete. The court will reset the dispositive motion deadline at a later time, along with a deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant's motion.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff need not respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 44) until the court so orders; and

         2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 48) is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Jones v. Clark

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 3, 2015
2:14-cv-0987 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Jones v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:GERALD JONES, Plaintiff, v. C. CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 3, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-0987 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)