From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. City of Buffalo Sch. Dist.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-20

Renee JONES, Claimant–Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent–Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered August 11, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of claimant to renew her prior application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.Campbell & Shelton LLP, Eden (R. Colin Campbell of Counsel), for claimant–appellant.MEMORANDUM:

Claimant appeals from an order denying her motion to renew a prior application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. It is well settled that “[a] motion for leave to renew ‘shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior [application] that would change the prior determination’ ..., and ‘shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior [application]’ ” ( Doe v. North Tonawanda Cent. School Dist., 91 A.D.3d 1283, 1284, 937 N.Y.S.2d 647). Here, “[t]he motion to renew was properly denied [inasmuch as claimant] failed to offer a valid excuse for failing to submit the new material on the original [application]” ( Linden v. Moskowitz, 294 A.D.2d 114, 116, 743 N.Y.S.2d 65, lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 505, 755 N.Y.S.2d 712, 785 N.E.2d 734; see Schilling v. Malark, 13 A.D.3d 1153, 1154, 787 N.Y.S.2d 533).

*851 It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, and LINDLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. City of Buffalo Sch. Dist.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2012
94 A.D.3d 1479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Jones v. City of Buffalo Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Renee JONES, Claimant–Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 20, 2012

Citations

94 A.D.3d 1479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3054
942 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

Maurer v. Colton

Contrary to defendants' contention in appeal No. 2, the court properly denied that part of their subsequent…

Larke v. Moore

reargue, it is not appealable, and we therefore dismiss the appeal to that extent on that ground (see Gaiter…