From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Burrell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 17, 2016
136 A.D.3d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

02-17-2016

Craig JONES, appellant, v. Brenton L. BURRELL, also known as Devan Burrell, defendant, Double D Development, LLC, respondent.

Paul G. Gargiulo, White Plains, NY, for appellant. Steven I. Lubowitz, Scarsdale, N.Y. (Susan I. Lubowitz of counsel), for respondent.


Paul G. Gargiulo, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

Steven I. Lubowitz, Scarsdale, N.Y. (Susan I. Lubowitz of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Giacomo, J.), dated April 3, 2014, as granted the motion of the defendant Double D Development, LLC, for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Double D Development, LLC (hereinafter Double D), for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it. The only cause of action asserted against Double D in the amended complaint is a common-law negligence cause of action to recover damages for injuries caused by a domestic animal. Since New York does not recognize such a cause of action, aside from the limited exception set forth in Hastings v. Sauve, 21 N.Y.3d 122, 125–126, 967 N.Y.S.2d 658, 989 N.E.2d 940 regarding a farm animal that strays from the place where it is kept (see Carey v. Schwab, 122 A.D.3d 1142, 1143–1145, 997 N.Y.S.2d 180 ), which is not at issue here, Double D established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it (see generally Sareyani– Coffey v. McAleer, 112 A.D.3d 907, 909, 977 N.Y.S.2d 403 ; Roche v. Bryant, 81 A.D.3d 707, 708, 916 N.Y.S.2d 185 ). In opposition to this prima facie showing, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.The plaintiff's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court or without merit.

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones v. Burrell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 17, 2016
136 A.D.3d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Jones v. Burrell

Case Details

Full title:Craig JONES, appellant, v. Brenton L. BURRELL, also known as Devan…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 17, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
136 A.D.3d 866