From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones-Ledbetter v. Biltmore Auto Sales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 12, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the purpose of establishing an expedited discovery schedule.

The court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for a severance. The questions of law and fact involved in the main action and the third-party action are inextricably interwoven such that a single trial is appropriate in furtherance of the interests of judicial economy and consistency of the verdicts (see, Shanley v. Callanan Indus., 54 N.Y.2d 52, 57; Guilford v. Netter, 179 A.D.2d 801, 802; Klein v. City of Long Beach, 154 A.D.2d 346, 347).

Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jones-Ledbetter v. Biltmore Auto Sales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Jones-Ledbetter v. Biltmore Auto Sales

Case Details

Full title:THOMASA JONES-LEDBETTER, Respondent, v. BILTMORE AUTO SALES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

Techcon Contr., Inc. v. Village of Lynbrook

Since the issues in these actions are intertwined, judicial economy and consistency of verdicts indicate that…

Perez v. Argo Corporaton

The questions of law and fact involved in the main action and the third-party actions are inextricably…