From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joiner v. Perkerson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 10, 1981
287 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

62544.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 10, 1981.

Action on contract. Toombs Superior Court. Before Judge Hartley.

Millard B. Shepherd, Jr., for appellant.

Howard C. Kaufold, Jr., for appellee.


1. Applications for a new trial must be filed within 30 days from the entry of judgment on the verdict. Code § 70-301. Entry means filing the judgment signed by the judge in the office of the clerk of court. Code § 6-903. Therefore, a judgment is not appealable until it is entered, and a motion for new trial filed prior to such entry of judgment is void. Gibson v. Hodges, 221 Ga. 779 (2) ( 147 S.E.2d 329) (1966). This, however, does not render the appeal itself void if the notice of appeal is in fact, as mandated by Code § 6-803, filed within 30 days after the entry of the order finally disposing of the motion. Harrison v. Harrison, 229 Ga. 692 (1) ( 194 S.E.2d 87) (1972). In the present case the motion for new trial was denied as untimely filed by order of May 4, 1981, and the notice of appeal was filed on the 18th of the same month. Thus, while the motion for new trial was properly denied, the appeal was timely and this court has jurisdiction to consider the enumerations of error.

2. Since both enumerations of error are directed only to the court's action in denying the motion for new trial, that judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Banke, J., concurs. Carley, J., concurs specially.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 10, 1981.


Summaries of

Joiner v. Perkerson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 10, 1981
287 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Joiner v. Perkerson

Case Details

Full title:JOINER v. PERKERSON

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 10, 1981

Citations

287 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
160 Ga. App. 343

Citing Cases

Williamson v. State of Georgia

OCGA § 5-5-40. Joiner v. Perkerson, 160 Ga. App. 343 ( 287 S.E.2d 327) (1981). Where the purported motion for…

State v. Seignious

Motion for new trial would have been premature as no judgment had been rendered on the jury's verdict. Joiner…