From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnstone v. Weibel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 1909
131 App. Div. 166 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

March 5, 1909.

Martin Byrne, for the appellant.

Arthur H. Cameron, for the respondent.


This action was commenced by the service of a summons stating that if the defendant failed to appear judgment would be taken against him for twenty-six dollars and fifty cents and costs of the action. The pleadings were oral, the plaintiff's attorney stating that his complaint was for "claim and delivery and damages." It appears from the bill of particulars that his cause of action is based upon the ownership of a safe, in the possession of the defendant, which he demands, with damages sustained in consequence of defendant's refusal to deliver it to him. The municipal justice has found for the plaintiff, and directed the entry of judgment in his favor, adjudging that he recover the possession of the safe with six dollars and fifty cents damages for its detention and costs. From the judgment accordingly entered this appeal is taken.

Defendant contends that the trial court had no jurisdiction because there was no affidavit or complaint accompanying the summons, and that the latter contains no reference to the nature of the action. The plaintiff did not seek to replevin the safe; he had the right to waive this privilege, and await possession obtained under his judgment. The court acquired jurisdiction by the service of the summons, and where a defendant has thus been brought into court, the plaintiff is at liberty to set up any cause of action that he chooses. ( Sharp v. Clapp, 15 App. Div. 445. ) The judgment did not fix the value of the property, and was not in the alternative, which the appellant argues presents reversible error. In this he is mistaken. In Hammond v. Morgan ( 101 N.Y. 179) it was held that a judgment for plaintiff in an action of replevin may be entered, although the jury has not assessed any damages or found the value of the property.

The judgment of the Municipal Court must be affirmed, with costs.

WOODWARD, JENKS, GAYNOR and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Johnstone v. Weibel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 1909
131 App. Div. 166 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Johnstone v. Weibel

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES J. JOHNSTONE, Respondent, v . ADOLPH WEIBEL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1909

Citations

131 App. Div. 166 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
115 N.Y.S. 255

Citing Cases

Stone v. Church

The writ, however, is not essential to the commencement of the action and a maintenance of the action is not…

New York Brooklyn Brewing Co. v. Angelo

In such case the chattel is awarded to the defendant, who may enforce that judgment by execution. ( Hammond…