From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Woods

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 21, 2010
9:07-CV-1018 (N.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2010)

Opinion

9:07-CV-1018.

May 21, 2010

JONATHAN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, pro se, UpState Correctional Facility, Malone, NY.

HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Defendants, Department of Law, Albany, New York, ROGER W. KINSEY, ESQ., Asst. Attorney General.


DECISION and ORDER


Plaintiff, Johnathan Johnson, brought this civil rights action in September 2007, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated March 2, 2010, the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 70) be granted and that judgment be granted to all defendants on all claims. The plaintiff has filed timely objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review of the entire file, including the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff has objected, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Homer, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 70) is GRANTED;

2. Judgment is GRANTED to all defendants on all claims; and

3. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Woods

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 21, 2010
9:07-CV-1018 (N.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WOODS, Superintendent; S. THOMPSON…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 21, 2010

Citations

9:07-CV-1018 (N.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2010)