From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 28, 2008
Civil No. 07-4910 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-4910 (RHK/SRN).

January 28, 2008


ORDER


The Court has conducted a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson's January 3, 2008 Report and Recommendation and Petitioner's Objections thereto. Judge Nelson has recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and the action be dismissed with prejudice.

Based on said de novo review, the Court concludes that Judge Nelson's recommended disposition is supported by the record before her and applicable legal principles. Accordingly, and upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 6) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED;

3. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;

4. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED; and

5. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Johnson v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 28, 2008
Civil No. 07-4910 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. U.S. Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:Sir Albert Johnson, Petitioner, v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jan 28, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 07-4910 (RHK/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Perkins v. Kallis

“[W]here a prisoner files a [habeas] petition raising grounds that were available but not relied upon in a…

Hamilton v. Roehrich

However, because all of that evidence was readily available, or discoverable, at the time of Hamilton's…