From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Town of Fishkill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1999
262 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued May 13, 1999

June 21, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., (1) the defendants Town of Fishkill and Commercial Interior Contracting Corporation separately appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated September 30, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 Lab., and (2) Commercial Interior Contracting Corporation appeals from an amended order of the same court, dated November 23, 1998, which denied its motion for leave to file a jury demand nunc pro tunc.

Cooper McCann, LLP, Elmsford, N.Y. (Thomas M. Bloomer and Thomas H. Kukowski of counsel), for appellant Town of Fishkill.

Marshall, Conway Wright, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven L. Sonkin of counsel), for appellant Commercial Interior Contracting Corporation.

William E. Stanton, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Habiague of counsel), for respondents.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the amended order dated September 30, 1998, is reversed, and the motion for summary judgment is denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that the amended order dated November 23, 1998, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

Pursuant to CPLR 3212(a), "[a]ny party may move for summary judgment in any action, after issue has been joined * * * such motion shall be made no later than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, except with leave of court on good cause shown". The plaintiffs' summary judgment motion, filed more than 270 days after the filing of the note of issue, was untimely. The court erred in granting the late motion, which was made without leave and without good cause shown for the delay ( see, Olzaski v. Locust Valley Central School District, 256 A.D.2d 320 [2d Dept., Dec. 7, 1998]).

The denial of the motion of the appellant Commercial Interior Contracting Corporation to file a jury demand nunc pro tunc was a proper exercise of discretion.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Town of Fishkill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 1999
262 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Johnson v. Town of Fishkill

Case Details

Full title:L. ERIC JOHNSON, et al., respondents, v. TOWN OF FISHKILL, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 431

Citing Cases

Hyatt v. Queens W. Dev. Corp.

Thus, by the purpose of the clear intent and unequivocal language of the Court of Appeals in Gibbs , Brill ,…

Degaetano v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Shmulevich v. Gabbidon, 253 A.D.2d 756 (2nd Dept.1998); Krug v. Jones, 252 A.D.2d 572 (2nd Dept.1998);…