From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 25, 2014
428 S.W.3d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 76313.

2014-03-25

Anthony JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Joel P. Fahnestock, Judge. Anthony Johnson, Jefferson City, MO, appellant acting pro se. Mary Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Joel P. Fahnestock, Judge.
Anthony Johnson, Jefferson City, MO, appellant acting pro se. Mary Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: JAMES EDWARD WELSH, C.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Anthony Johnson appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his post-conviction motion on the basis that it was a “successive motion” and, thus, was not reviewable under Rule 29.15(1). We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 25, 2014
428 S.W.3d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

428 S.W.3d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Johnson appealed the motion court's judgment, which we affirmed in a per curiam order. See Johnson v. State,…

Johnson v. State

Johnson appealed the motion court's judgment, which we affirmed in a per curiam order. See Johnson v. State,…