From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 19, 2006
202 S.W.3d 35 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 86907.

September 19, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, John F. Kintz, Judge.

Michelle Murphy Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Daniel Neal McPherson — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.


ORDER


Stanley T. Johnson (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App.E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 19, 2006
202 S.W.3d 35 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stanley T. JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 19, 2006

Citations

202 S.W.3d 35 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Movant appealed this denial, maintaining that the motion court clearly erred because he alleged facts, not…