From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 9, 2010
330 S.W.3d 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. ED92808.

March 9, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Richard C. Bresnahan, Judge.

Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Prior report: 254 S.W.3d 916.


ORDER


Carl B. Johnson (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his claim that his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness who would have testified that Movant did not initiate the physical fight with the victim. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 9, 2010
330 S.W.3d 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carl B. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 9, 2010

Citations

330 S.W.3d 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Bowersox

Petitioner appealed this judgment, asserting that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that…